Talk:Kakeru Ryūen/@comment-2601:18D:4800:7680:CC0A:6B96:451D:A7A1-20171127164357/@comment-32644940-20171128005309

I don't think it's unrealistic. Think of C-Class scenario as something like this: Kakeru, the only person who masterfully lead the group, strategize and execute the plan he has mind solely for the purpose of promoting his class into A-Class suddenly lost his will to fight, thus deciding to leave Advanced Nurturing High School into his own accord. His gang will more likely realize that staying in such institution with no one to cling, trust, and follow onto will not be different from joining a class without aim, purpose, and objective for the next 2 years.

Being a student of such high school will not guarantee a 100% employment in the future anyway, as it was said somewhere along the series that only those who are in A-Class will get such reward. Therefore, dropping out of the institution is better than staying in such flawed system.

This is where the Stockholm Syndrome comes in. C-Class gained a lot during his reign as the class representative. He even showed his good side by sacrificing his lifestyle during the Summer Special Exam. That's a remarkable manifestation of Messiah Complex if you ask me — one of the proponents of a charismatic leader.

In the case of Mio, she's not wholly against Kakeru leading the group. She only has a conflict with the way with him resorting to extreme violence to get the job done — to which, in one or another, can be achieved through peaceful and tactful means like Kiyotaka does. So, if Kakeru's leading C-Class does not sacrifice the group's welfare, why support him dropping out of the system then? If you believe Mio hates Kakeru so much, then isn't it's better to make him stay with them and suffer with the whole C-Class -- and let him fix what he lost?